133x Filetype PDF File size 1.61 MB Source: core.ac.uk
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto Clinical Pharmacy Group: Social Pharmacy Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy Faculty of Pharmacy University of Helsinki Public Health and Patient Care Aspects in Pharmacy Education and Pharmacists’ Role in National Public Health Programs in India Siva Prasada Reddy Maddirala Venkata ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Pharmacy of the University of Helsinki, for public examination in Auditorium Athena, Siltavuorenpenger 3 A, on Friday 19 May 2017, at 12 noon. Helsinki 2017 Supervisors Professor Marja Airaksinen, PhD Clinical Pharmacy Group: Social Pharmacy Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland Proprietor Pharmacist Peter Kielgast, PhD Taastrup Pharmacy Taastrup Hovedgade 60 2630 Taastrup, Denmark Pre-examiners Professor B. Suresh Vice-Chancellor, Jagadguru Sri Shivarathreeshwara University and President, Pharmacy Council of India JSS Medical Institutions Campus Sri Shivarathreeshwara Nagara Mysuru – 570 015, Karnataka, India Dr. T. V. Narayana Director, Vikas Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences Nidigatla village, Korukonda Mandal, Near Airport Rajahmundry, East Godavari Dist Andhra Pradesh – 533103, India Opponent Fernando Fernandez-Llimos, Ph.D., PharmD., M.B.A. Assistant Professor, Department of Social Pharmacy University of Lisbon, Portugal © Siva Prasada Reddy Maddirala Venkata 2017 ISBN 978-951-51-3169-0 (paperback) ISBN 978-951-51-3170-6 (PDF) Dissertationes Scholae Doctoralis Ad Sanitatem Investigandam Universitatis Helsinkiensis ISSN 2342-3161 (print) ISSN 2342-317x (online) University of Helsinki, Finland 2017 ABSTRACT Pharmacies are convenient for most people to get to and there is no need for an appointment to see pharmacist which makes them natural first port of call1 healthcare providers in the society. Worldwide, pharmacists are potentially a vital link in healthcare chain. Since public health services do not cater to all the population, pharmacies and private health providers can play a major role in the healthcare system. This also applies to India with a population of over 1.3 billion. Though there is a large presence, pharmacists both in public as well as in private 2,3,4 sector remain largely an untapped resource in India. Aims and objectives The objective of this study was to assess public health and patient care aspects in pharmacy education and the role of pharmacists in national public health programs (NPHPs) in India. The research goal was to find out possibilities and ways of extending pharmacists involvement in national public health programs and how pharmacist education could partly facilitate this shift. The research was divided into four studies which were published as separate original publications. Two of the studies were programmatic studies (I, II) and two cross-sectional surveys (III, IV). The studies I-IV had the following specific objectives: to review pharmacy education system in India from public health and patient care perspective. to compare curriculum of different Indian pharmacy programs (DPharm, BPharm, and PharmD) to see overall differences with a focus on the amount of time devoted for pharmaceutical policies and public health, patient care and pharmacy practice aspects in the programs (I). to compare Indian pharmacy curriculum at all levels with pharmacy curriculum of USA, Finland and Denmark (II). 3 to explore acquaintance of final year pharmacy students with 11 major National Public Health Programs and their attitude on pharmacists’ involvement in public health and patient care (III). to characterize physician perceptions on the role of pharmacists in public health and patient care (IV). Comparison of curricula (I,II) The programmatic studies (I, II) were conducted between March 2012 and 2014. The curricula collected from the statutory agencies were used for the comparison to see the overall differences with a focus on the amount of time devoted for pharmaceutical policies and public health, patient care and pharmacy practice aspects in the programs. (I) Syllabi of courses leading to 1) registered pharmacist title in India (DPharm, BPharm and PharmD), 2) USA (PharmD, curriculum from University of Florida), 3) Finland (Master of Science in Pharmacy program from University of Helsinki), and 4) Denmark (Master of Science in Pharmacy program from University of Copenhagen) were used for comparison. (II) The results indicate that Indian DPharm and BPharm programs were industry focused, and only PharmD has focus on clinical pharmacy and patient oriented services (I). Indian and US PharmD programs contain most and Indian DPharm and BPharm least public health and patient care aspects (II). DPharm holders are mainstays of pharmacy practice in India but their degree least contains patient care and public health aspects. There is a gap in curriculum, particularly at DPharm level. (I) Pharmacy Students’ Perceived Knowledge and Attitude on their role in NPHPs (III) This study was conducted as a classroom survey among final year DPharm, BPharm and PharmD students in India to explore acquaintance with 11 major NPHPs and their attitude on pharmacists’ involvement in public health and patient care (III). A survey instrument was 4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.