126x Filetype PDF File size 1.16 MB Source: ptgmedia.pearsoncmg.com
The Incremental Commitment Spiral Model: Phased View Stage II: Stage I: Incremental Definition Incremental Development, Operations and Production ICSM Anchor ECR VCR FCR DCR OCR1 ... Points 1 DCR2 1 n 1 Operations ICSM Life-Cycle elopment 2 1 2 ... v and Production aluation oundations De (O&P) 3 Phases Exploratio V F elopment oundations v F De oundations F Activities Concurrent risk- and Initial scoping Concept System life-cycle Increment 1 Increment 1 opportunity-driven definition architecture and Development Operations and growth of system Investment ops concept Increment 2 Production understanding and analysis Build-to Foundations Increment 2 definition increment plans rebaseline Development ... and specifications Increment 3 NDI, outsource Foundations partner selections rebaseline Evaluation of evidence Feasibility ... ... ... ... ... of feasibility to proceed Evidence Stakeholder review High, but Acceptable and commitment addressable Too high, Risk? Risk? Risk? Risk? Risk? unaddressable Negligible Adjust scope, priorities, or discontinue Exploration Valuation Foundations Development Operations ECR = Commitment VCR = Commitment FCR = Commitment DCR = Commitment OCRn = Commitment n Review Review Review Review Review n n Reprinted with permission from Human-System Integration in the System Development Process, 2007 by the National Academy of Sciences, Courtesy of the National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. Feasibility Evidence Description Content Evidence provided by the developer and validated by independent experts that, if the system is built to the specified architecture, it will: h Satisfy the requirements: capability, interface, level of service, and evolution h Support the operational concept h Be buildable within the budgets and schedules in the plan h Generate a viable return on investment h Generate satisfactory outcomes for all of the success-critical stakeholders h Resolve all major risks by treating shortfalls in evidence as risks and covering them by risk management plans h Serve as a basis for stakeholders’ commitment to proceed Principles Trump Diagrams The Four ICSM Principles 1. Stakeholder value-based guidance. 2. Incremental commitment and accountability. 3. Concurrent multi-discipline engineering 4. Evidence and risk-based decisions. Risk Meta-Principle of Balance: Balancing the risk of doing too little and the risk of doing too much will generally find a middle course sweet spot that is about the best you can do. Theory W (Win-Win) Success Theorem: A system will succeed if and only if it makes winners of its success-critical stakeholders. System Success Realization Theorem: Making winners of your success-critical stakeholders requires: 1. Identifying all of the success-critical stakeholders. 2. Understanding how each stakeholder wants to win. 3. Having the success-critical stakeholders negotiate among themselves a win- win set of product and process plans. 4. Controlling progress toward the negotiated win-win realization, including adapting it to change. The Incremental Commitment Spiral Model Cumulative Level of Understanding, Product and Process Detail (Risk-Driven) S N O 4 I T A Concurrent D N U O F Engineering of T N 3 S N O I E T 3 A M D Products and N P U O O F L T Processes E N 2 V E S N E O M I T 2 A D P D N 2 O U N L O F O E I V T1 T E N A D E NS R M TIO E N 1 P A P O D O L N O TI E U RISK-BASED A V FO ON R E TI D A E U STAKEHOLDER L P A V O COMMITMENT ORA L T P I O X N REVIEW E POINTS: 654321 Opportunities to proceed, merge phases, backtrack or terminate 1Exploration Commitment Review Risk-Based Decisions 2 Valuation Commitment Review 3 Foundations Commitment Review Acceptable 4 Development Commitment Review Negligible Risk Too High, Operations and Development Unaddressable Evidence-Based Review Content 5 1 2 - A first-class deliverable Commitment Review High, But - Independent expert review Operations and Development Addressable 6 2 3 - Shortfalls are uncertainties and risks Commitment Review Reprinted with permission from Human-System Integration in the System Development Process, 2007 by the National Academy of Sciences, Courtesy of the National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. Principles Trump Diagrams Stage II: Stage I: Incremental Definition Incremental Development, Operations and Production OCR ICSM Anchor ECR VCR FCR DCR 1 ... 1 DCR Points 2 1 n 1 Operations ICSM Life-Cycle elopment 2 1 2 ... v and Production aluation oundations De (O&P) 3 Phases Exploratio V F elopment oundations v F De oundations F Activities Concurrent risk- and Initial scoping Concept System life-cycle Increment 1 Increment 1 opportunity-driven definition architecture and Development Operations and growth of system Investment ops concept Increment 2 Production understanding and analysis Build-to Foundations Increment 2 definition increment plans rebaseline Development ... and specifications Increment 3 NDI, outsource Foundations partner selections rebaseline Evaluation of evidence Feasibility ... ... ... ... ... of feasibility to proceed Evidence Stakeholder review High, but Acceptable and commitment addressable Too high, Risk? Risk? Risk? Risk? Risk? unaddressable Negligible Adjust scope, priorities, or discontinue Exploration Valuation Foundations Development Operations ECR = Commitment VCR = Commitment FCR = Commitment DCR = Commitment OCRn = Commitment n Review Review Review Review Review n n Reprinted with permission from Human-System Integration in the System Development Process, 2007 by the National Academy of Sciences, Courtesy of the National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. Feasibility Evidence Description Content Evidence provided by the developer and validated by independent experts that, if the system is built to the specified architecture, it will: h Satisfy the requirements: capability, interface, level of service, and evolution h Support the operational concept h Be buildable within the budgets and schedules in the plan h Generate a viable return on investment h Generate satisfactory outcomes for all of the success-critical stakeholders h Resolve all major risks by treating shortfalls in evidence as risks and covering them by risk management plans h Serve as a basis for stakeholders’ commitment to proceed
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.