149x Filetype PDF File size 0.62 MB Source: www.witpress.com
Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 19, © 1998 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-355X The Dirac delta function and its use in plate bending problems under generalized loading A. El-Zafrany School of Mechanical Engineering, Cranfield University, Email: a. el-zafrany @ cranfield. ac. uk Abstract In this paper, after a brief introduction on the Dirac delta function and its interesting properties, some of its applications to the boundary element analysis of thick plates in bending are introduced. Modelling of concentrated shear forces and bending moments in boundary integral equations is firstly discussed. Then the treatment of domain loading terms for plate bending problems under line loading is explained, where line shear forces and bending moments are assumed acting on arbitrary curves defined on the plate midplane. Some numerical examples are demonstrated and the results were compared with corresponding analytical solutions. It is clear that, with the use of Dirac delta functions, the boundary element analysis of thick plates in bending, with general cases of loading, has been simplified, and very accurate results were obtained. 1 Introduction The delta function was introduced by Dirac' as a quantity b(x) depending on a parameter jc, and satisfying the conditions: Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 19, © 1998 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-355X 244 Boundary Element Research In Europe oo f&(x)dx = l, 6(a) =0 for x*Q (1) — oo with the following interesting property: oo ff(x)&(x-a)dx=f(a) (2) — oo Dirac considered that 6(x) is not a function of x according to the usual mathematical definition of a function, and he preferred for it to be classified as an improper function. This inspired mathematicians to use the term Generalized Functions for the 8 function and similar other functions, and Schwartz^ systemized the theory of such generalized functions. A simple presentation of their theory is also given by Hoskins.^ The derivatives of delta functions are also treated as generalized functions. Although such derivatives are defined by means of an integral expression,^ it is acceptable to define the derivatives using first principles or limit rules. Jaswon & Symnf emphasized the fact that the use of delta functions provides a quick approach to results, specially boundary integral equation derivations, which could otherwise be obtained by limiting processes of classical analysis. El-Zafrany^ has simplified the definition of Dirac delta functions in multiple-dimensional space, and allocated physical or geometrical meanings to two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and axisymmetric delta functions. A Dirac delta function may be defined in a ^-dimensional space, in terms of one-dimensional delta functions, as follows: where x = ix^ x^ "' xA which represents a vector of Cartesian coordinates. If / is a finite function defined within a d-dimensional domain A, then: = /(*,) (4) Q where *, is inside the domain £1 If the previous function has also finite partial derivatives up to the mth order, then it can be shown that: Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 19, © 1998 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-355X Boundary Element Research In Europe 245 /» 3tn &/*._*. \ *"**> (5) I -\ tn-I m-l where l<,m. In this paper, the use of Dirac delta function in modelling generalized loading cases, and their applications to boundary element analysis of thick plates in bending are demonstrated. Modelling of concentrated shear forces and bending moments in boundary integral equations is firstly discussed. Then the treatment of domain loading terms for plate bending problems under line loading is explained, where shear forces and bending moments are assumed acting on arbitrary curves defined on the plate midplane. 2 Plate bending example The boundary integral equations for thick plates in bending can be derived and expressed in the following fornf: (6) + r (7) i(6J, + (32(6,), + ^33^, + f (7i3 8. + T^Q, + 7-33^) dT (8) and the kernel functions in the domain loading integrals can be simplified as follows®: * V|^2-, L, =11 - ^-*' V*|»' (9) (l-v)A^ j a%«' ' [ (l-v)X Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 19, © 1998 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-355X 246 Boundary Element Research In Europe where 4>* = — (logz-1), V*4>* = M^ (10) on D 2 7t D and z = Ar, (^ 3 Case of concentrated forces and moments 3.1 Representation in terms of domain loading intensity Concentrated forces and moments may be represented in terms of distributions over the domain, using Dirac delta functions, as explained next. (a) Case of a concentrated force Consider the case where a concentrated force F in the z direction is acting on a plate at midplane point (*,, y,) . Defining a small circle of radius e centred at (x^y^, as shown in Figure 1, then an equivalent loading intensity can be defined as follows: p q(x,y) = 0 for r > 0, q(x,y) = lim — - for r - 0 €-0 7t€^ where r = J(x -xrf + (y -yrf . Hence, it can be deduced from the definition of two-dimensional Dirac delta functions* that: (b) Case of a concentrated moment A concentrated moment Ty in the y direction, acting at (*,,?/), can be represented by a couple of two forces, as shown in Figure 2, where: T FZ = -FI = lim -± * Using the previous analysis, the loading intensity equivalent to every force can be expressed as follows: x „ ., \ ,- r «(*-* y-y,) q(FJ = Fi6(*-jc,,y-yj) = - lim -^- AJC
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.