196x Filetype PDF File size 2.07 MB Source: aspb.org
How to Read a Scientific Paper What is a scientific paper? ………………………..…….. 2 Scientific papers are peer‐reviewed....……….....… 3 Anatomy of a scientific paper ……………………….... 4 How to read a scientific paper ………………………… 5 Ethics in research and publishing………………….... 6 Understanding numerical data ……….…………….… 7 What does “statistical significance” mean? ....... 8 Case study: Buy My Oranges……………..……………..9 Appendix: Numerical analysis .....……………….... 12 Additional resources and credits ………………… 13 What is a scientific paper? Scientific papers go straight to the use in new ways to address different source questions. If someone asks you about a new movie you haven’t seen yet, what do The authors of scientific papers also you say? Maybe, “I haven’t seen it, but provide an interpretation of what they I’ve heard it’s good.” We generally try to think their new information means and distinguish first-hand from second-hand how it contributes to our understanding of how the natural world works. By presenting the data itself as well as the analysis, other authors can evaluate these interpretations for themselves. Because our understanding is always changing, sometimes the interpretations of the data can be re- evaluated in light of new ideas and new data. Society needs scientific literature Much scientific research is publicly information. Like the children’s game of funded, and the knowledge and “telephone,” information can change as technologies that emerge from it is passed along. To get the real story, research have social impacts. whether a film review or the results of a Traditionally, the output from scientific new research study, go to the source. research has been published in journals that are not widely available Scientific papers present data and outside of university libraries, but in the interpretations past decade there has been a trend Scientists report the results of their toward increasing openness in science research by writing and publishing and a desire to make research articles scientific papers, which are written in a more broadly available. However, it is very formal style. One of the objectives not sufficient to make these resources of a scientific paper is to make available, as in many cases they are available the data from a set of studies written for experts and practicing so that others can learn from them and scientists and therefore not readily build on them to address new comprehensible to those who haven’t questions. By publishing and sharing been trained in the discipline. We’ve data, scientists work together to written this article as a guide to help advance our understanding. Some people learn to read the scientific articles include results from a few literature, with the goal of increasing targeted studies, and others present access to science and communication large datasets that other scientists can about science. Copyright 2013 American Society of Plant Biologists. www.aspb.org Sccientiific ppaperrs aree peeer-revviewwed Peer revieew is a traddition in sccholarly ee performeed or that the analysis of the b publication. Prior to publicationn, an article reesults be reevised. is evaluated by otheer experts, usually anonymouusly, and these evaluuations aree MMost of the articles of the “masss media” used to immprove thee paper. Thhe reviewers (nnewspaperrs, magazinnes, and bblogs) are may recommmend thaat additional data be noot subject tto peer revview. Althoough they cientific collected and analyzzed or thatt claims noot caan be effecctive at intrroducing s well suppoorted by thhe data be removed. toopics to a bbroader audience, theey are not allways sufficiently cauutious in thheir In the stanndard process, sshown to the righht, the authors suubmit their papeer to a journal edditor, who evaluuates whether thhe topic is a good match for the jo uurnal. If so, the paaper is sent to twwo or more expeerts, who read it and provide thheir frank evalluations, annalysis of tthe results of the studdy and including wwhether thhe conclusiions are soometimes overstate tthe conclussions. For supportedd by the evvidence andd whether exxample, the mass meedia often states the study is novel, immportant, aand thhat high fruuctose cornn syrup cauuses interestingg. The edittor forwardds the obbesity, althhough theree is little coonvincing commentss to the authors, alonng with a daata to suppport this claaim. Similarly, a decision to accept thhe paper, to requestt reesearch repport might show that under revision, oor to rejectt it. laaboratory cconditions, a new druug slows thhe rate of ggrowth of ccultured cancer cells, The role oof the revieewer is to eevaluate thhe buut the meddia may describe it ass a new experimenntal designn and the ddata cuure for canncer. presentedd, as well aas the interrpretation oof the resultss. Sometimmes, the reeviewer will If you want tto know more about a news find that thhe experimmental desiign was noot reeport on a scientific bbreakthrouggh, find rigorous eenough to ssupport thee thhe original, peer-revieewed articlle and interpretations madee by the auuthors, in reead what thhe researcchers actuaally which ca sse the revieewer mightt diiscovered. recommend that addditional expperiments Anatomy of a scientific paper TITLE AUTHOR INFORMATION ABSTRACT: A summary of the study and findings, written by the author. INTRODUCTION: A statement of what is currently known about the study subject that articulates the questions being investigated. It cites other scholarly works, lays the foundations for the study, and sometimes states a hypothesis to be tested. RESULTS: A description of the research conducted and the results obtained. Results are presented as tables, large datasets, and figures, which Figure legend can include graphs, videos, diagrams, and photographs. Some papers include additional supporting data as a supplement. DISCUSSION: An analysis and interpretation of the data presented that integrates the new information with prior findings, states the implications of the work, and sometimes generates new hypotheses tobe tested. METHODS: A description of how the studies were conducted, with sufficient detail so that others can repeat them exactly. REFERENCES: The list of the articles cited in the paper that provide information on the research topic and the methods used.
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.